Most companies want to be known as innovative.

To bastardize the Wallace Simpson line, “you can never be too rich, too thin or too innovative.”

The problem is those same companies often depend on adjectives to tout their breakthroughs.

The Wall Street Journal challenged the use of the “i” word over ten years ago:

• “Businesses throw around the term to show they’re on the cutting edge of everything from technology and medicine to snacks and cosmetics. Companies are touting chief innovation officers, innovation teams, innovation strategies and even innovation days.
  .
  “But that doesn’t mean the companies are actually doing any innovating. Instead, they are using the word to convey monumental change when the progress they’re describing is quite ordinary.”

And it’s only gotten worse since the Journal published this piece.

How do you communicate innovation that lands?

By reverse engineering the recent Wall Street Journal, “Amazon Wants to Deliver Your Order Without a Box, But Neighbors May See Your Snore Steps,” we can answer the question.

It’s easy to forget that innovation can come in many different forms, not just a brilliant AI scientist experiencing a eureka moment. The topic of packaging doesn’t exactly cause one’s pulse to race. Yet you’ll see that the article does convey “monumental change.”

Drilling down to the next level, storytelling techniques drive the narrative:

Quantify

Amazon doesn’t say, “we’ve made progress in shipping items without extra packaging.”

The company offers that “about 11% of items arrive without extra packaging.”

As a second example, we learn that “Amazon has cut the distance items travel from fulfillment centers to customers by 15%, and decreased “touches,” or how often a package is handled, by 12%.
.

Levity

We purposely use the word “levity,” not “humor.”

No one expects you to be the second coming of Jimmy Fallon. Instead, a smile — even the start of a smile — is a win.

It turns out that less packaging can have some unintended consequences.

Like a giant package of toilet paper sitting on their doorsteps for all their neighbors to see.
.

Small “f” failure

The classic story arc showcases a beginning, an end and something going wrong in between, which creates the tension.

This doesn’t work in business communications, as companies don’t want to proactively share the bad stuff occurring behind the curtain.

But they can talk about small “f” failures, which delivers a smidgen of realness like this line:

• “While Amazon is losing some branding power from cutting back on its signature brown boxes, it is betting that the elimination of extra packaging will create goodwill with its customers …”

And here’s another small “f” failure:

• “Amazon hasn’t been able to yet figure out how to eliminate extra packaging for some fragile items, such as vinyl records.”

Why does Amazon share “negative” content? They understand that a) it wins over the journalists and b) the overall impression on the reader still nets out as a positive.
.

Anecdotes

The PR function often pitches at the 10K-foot level when it’s critical to take it down to the 5K-foot level and even the 1K-foot level, where anecdotes deliver proof points.

Check out this killer anecdote on screwdrivers that uses contrast (before/after) in the setup:

• “One item the company put through its system was a package of screwdrivers. The screwdrivers were originally packaged using soft plastic that made it hazardous to ship without extra protection. Amazon helped the vendor, which it declined to name, design a new, six-sided container that would require no extra packaging. Then the company used AI to identify other vendors with similar screwdrivers and shared the new container design with them. The company reduced the size of the package by more than half to about 125 cubic inches, making it less expensive to ship.”

You can see the full article below.
.

Amazon Wants to Deliver Your Order Without a Box, But Neighbors May See Your Snore Strips

Millions of Amazon orders are arriving on doorsteps across the U.S. without any extra packaging. A new television may sit in the manufacturer’s box at the door. A blender appears as if it were picked off a store shelf. The same for a box of baby wipes or trash bags.

The change represents the next frontier in the tech giant’s overhaul of its delivery processes, one Chief Executive Andy Jassy hopes will appeal to customers who are put off by the volume of Amazon-branded boxes they receive and discard every week.

The company, in the past year, revamped its logistics network, enabling faster and more efficient deliveries. Eliminating or reducing packaging has become increasingly important for the company to maintain its dominance, reduce costs and reach its goals related to its climate impact.

“The recognition by a number of senior leaders was just that this is becoming more and more important,” said Pat Lindner, who Amazon hired last year as its first vice president of packaging and innovation. “There’s a significant need for our company to take the next step in innovation around packaging.”

About 11% of items that the company delivers now arrive without extra packaging, or what the company calls “ships in own container,” Amazon said. Customers typically are able to choose at checkout if they want extra packaging or prefer their order without it.

Challenges range from practical to emotional. Amazon needs to help its suppliers create packaging that is both sturdy enough to ship on its own while not adding extra material to undercut its whole purpose of doing away with packaging. And it needs to determine whether customers might not want to have, for instance, a giant package of toilet paper sitting on their doorsteps for all their neighbors to see.

Amazon is using its formidable clout with packaged-goods companies and other suppliers and vendors, as well as incentives, to get them to improve their packaging to survive shipping. Vendors on the site, for example, can get incentives to eliminate the extra packaging layer.

While Amazon is losing some branding power from cutting back on its signature brown boxes, it is betting that the elimination of extra packaging will create goodwill with its customers, many of whom, it said, have asked the company for such changes.

“Sometimes you get a giant box with a very little item that, quite frankly, wasn’t breakable in the first place. And you wonder why they used all that material,” said Kenneth Levine, a 76-year-old in River Vale, N.J., who said he receives Amazon packages about once a week. He has yet to notice the option to reduce packaging at checkout but said he would be open to it for reasonable and non-fragile items, like books.

There is also some chatter online that leaving deliveries visible could lead to other issues.

“The manufacturer’s box doesn’t have anything holding it shut, and isn’t designed to have a shipping label slapped on it,” a user on X, formerly Twitter, wrote, attaching a picture of a computer part shipped without an Amazon box.

“Amazon didn’t put my vacuum in an Amazon box — I’m gonna be PISSED if someone steals my package by the time I get home,” another user posted.

Amazon Help’s X account responded to both, citing its “Frustration-Free Packaging” that reduces the amount of packaging material.

The company sees its packaging initiative as a critical evolution after the success of fast-shipping efforts, Lindner said in an interview. Amazon, in the past year, has doubled down on getting items to customers quickly by overhauling its delivery operations to reduce how far products travel across the U.S. In its new regionalized model, many items stay near one of eight regions, The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this year.